Electronic Laboratory Notebook (ELN)

The lab notebook that also answers questions

Uncountable's ELN keeps the salient story of an experiment and makes it structured against a shared ontology of materials, processes, and results, so every entry is searchable by content, backed by embedded data and plots, and connected to LIMS, QC, PLM, and Project Management.

Searchable by content
find any entry by ingredient, process, result, or chemical structure, not just by who wrote it
Embedded data
instrument data and plots live inside the structured record, not kept in separate files
Compliant and connected
audit trails and e-signatures, linked to LIMS, QC, PLM, and Project Management

Deployed by 175+ enterprise product development teams

Lohmann logo with green abstract cross and tagline The Bonding Engineers in black text.
Dow company logo with white text on a red diamond-shaped background
Syngenta company logo with a green leaf above the letter g.
Beiersdorf
Clariant
Braskem company logo with stylized yellow and blue arrow design.
Total Energies Logo
St Jude Logo
Lubrizol company wordmark logo with blue curved line underneath the text.
Lohmann logo with green abstract cross and tagline The Bonding Engineers in black text.
Dow company logo with white text on a red diamond-shaped background
Syngenta company logo with a green leaf above the letter g.
Beiersdorf
Clariant
Braskem company logo with stylized yellow and blue arrow design.
Total Energies Logo
St Jude Logo
Lubrizol company wordmark logo with blue curved line underneath the text.

Deployed by Enterprise R&D and Innovation Teams

Your notebook holds the story.
It just cannot answer a question.

A traditional ELN is a scientific word processor: salient, but the results live in sentences no one can query. So a year of good work becomes a folder of documents that can only be searched by title and date, and the moment a scientist leaves, their notebook stops answering questions. Uncountable's ELN keeps the narrative and makes every entry structured, so the same notebook is searchable by ingredient, process, or measured result, with the data and plots embedded in the record itself.

Screenshot of a search interface showing results for additive > 2% and tensile > 22 MPa. The left panel displays a locked notebook entry for Blend 114 with additive 2.1%, cure 60°C for 24h, viscosity 240 cP, tensile 24 MPa, and a line graph of the instrument curve. The right panel lists matching entries: Blend 114 (2026 project) with 2.1% additive and 24 MPa tensile, Blend 092 (2024 project) with 2.4% additive and 23 MPa tensile, and an archived Trial A-7 with 2.0% additive and 22 MPa tensile. The interface indicates 18 entries across 4 projects and 3 years.

From first entry to connected record

It starts at the bench. Capture the experiment the way scientists already work, and make it structured from the first keystroke.

‍

‍Free-form narrative and structured fields, together: Write the experiment the way you'd tell it, while formulation, process, and observations are captured in configurable fields at the same time; not either/or, with templates for repeatable protocols so the record stays consistent without slowing anyone down.

The data lives in the entry: Instrument results, tables, and plots are embedded in the record, with full datasets preserved rather than pasted in as screenshots.

Fits how scientists work: Records are structured around the way the lab already runs, and much of the data flows in automatically from connected instruments.

Dashboard for experiment Blend 114 on high-gloss exterior coating shows a stress vs. strain graph with peak stress at 24 MPa. A table lists measurements: tensile stress at break 24 MPa, gloss 89 GU, pH 8.6, solids content 42%, viscosity 240 cP, strain at break 7.8%, dry film thickness 62 µm, surfactant active 2.1%, contrast ratio 0.98, fineness of grind 6.5 NS, freeze-thaw pass, and cure at 60°C for 24 hours. Below, a comparison table shows this run met target while others are under review, superseded, or failed.
A year of work should answer questions, not just store them. Every entry is searchable by content, across projects and years.

‍

Search by content, not by title: Find any entry by ingredient, process condition, or measured result, instead of hunting through documents named by initials and dates.

Failures stay findable too: Every experiment, including archived and failed ones, remains queryable and reusable, so a dead end still saves the next person time.

Knowledge that does not walk out: When a scientist leaves, their work stays searchable in the same system, so institutional knowledge does not leave with them.

Search results page from a notebook filtering entries where additive is greater than 2% and tensile strength is greater than 22 MPa, showing 9 matching entries from various projects like Exterior Waterborne, Clearcoat 4X, Interior Trim Enamel, and Primer Base. The table lists entries with blend names, additive percentages between 2.0% and 2.6%, tensile values from 22 to 25 MPa, and associated projects. Bar chart below displays counts per project, with Exterior Waterborne having the highest matches.
A governed, review-ready record should be a byproduct of the work, not a second job.

‍

Review and e-signature built in: Structured review and electronic signatures are part of the entry, so sign-off happens in the same place the work does.

Automatic audit trails: Every change is recorded, who changed what and when, without anyone maintaining a separate log.

Compliant by design: Versioned records with audit trails and e-signatures meet FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11, so audits are a report, not a scramble.

User interface for production formula approval of high-gloss exterior coating PF-0143 at Cedar Ridge Facility, approved by Meridian Building Products, validated May 12, 2026, released May 18, 2026. Audit log shows actions and status changes by Dana Whitmore, Priya Raghavan, and Marcus Feld. Composition lists Acrylic resin 52.0%, Titanium dioxide 24.5%, Water 19.6%, Surfactant SF-12 2.1%, Coalescent defoamer 1.2%, Rheology modifier 0.4%, Biocide 0.2%. Approval section shows signatures of Dana Whitmore (Formulation lead), Priya Raghavan (QA reviewer), Marcus Feld (Plant manager), and Elena Ruiz (Regulatory). Footer notes electronic signature by Dana Whitmore on May 18, 2026, 09:14 AM, with an immutable trail reference FDA 21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex II.
The notebook is one structured model with the rest of the platform, and it brings your history with it:

‍

LIMS for R&D: Samples and full instrument data linked to the notebook entry.

LIMS for Quality & QMS: Carry the R&D record into quality, with results traceable to the entry.

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM): Move a formulation from the notebook to production without re-entry.

Project Management: Track timelines, tasks, resourcing, and incoming requests across every project without leaving the formulation record.

Bodie AI: Draft notebooks from an entry in plain language.

Bring your history with you: Existing notebooks are migrated during a guided, staged rollout, so past work is searchable alongside new work from go-live.

Digital thread dashboard for coating and paint lot LOT-24-0391 AquaShield HG-700 showing QC results like viscosity 96 KU, gloss 88 GU, contrast ratio 0.98, fineness of grind 6.5 NS, adhesion 4B, tack-free time 35 min, VOC content 41 g/L, assigned spec HG-700 Release Spec, and status Promoted to released SKU. Related records include bench formulation, pilot scale-up, AquaShield HG-700 cleared and released stages. Timeline with events and owners from June to September 2024. Upstream material lots listed with COA on file. Downstream shows shipments 4, retained samples 2, and zero open deviations.

Traditional ELN vs Uncountable's connected ELN

A traditional ELN

The Uncountable ELN

Searchable only by exact keyword match (ctrl+F)
Structured entries searchable by content
Instrument data pasted in as a screenshot
Full datasets and plots embedded in the entry
Knowledge leaves when a scientist leaves
Every entry archived and queryable, failures included
A notebook that stands alone
Linked to LIMS, QC, and PLM on one model

Context in, reports out

An entry is never just the experiment. Tag it, link it to related work, attach the files it came from, and it is already part of the next report; no extra step, no separate tool.

Tag, link, and annotate anything

Add custom tags, links to related entries, files, and annotations directly on the record, so context lives with the data instead of in someone's memory or a separate tracker. Flag a result for review, or link it straight back to the trial it followed up on.

Every entry is reportable

Build real-time and historical reports with drag-and-drop charts and visualizations pulled straight from your data, combining experimental process and output in one place instead of a slide deck assembled by hand.

Reports stay current

A report pulls live from the entries behind it, so a report built last quarter still reflects this week's results without anyone rebuilding it or re-pasting a chart. Pull it up in next month's review and it's still current.
Diagram showing a laboratory experiment entry titled 'Blend 114' with tags, links, files, and a note, carrying its metadata to a Q3 Surfactant Screening Report chart where Blend 114 is highlighted with a value of 88, illustrating automatic transfer of tagged experiment data to the report.

The notebook, fully loaded

CAPTURE
Structured, searchable entries
Embedded data & plots
Full instrument-data capture
Standardize & find
Protocol & entry templates
Search by content across years
Review & compliance
Review & e-signatures
Automatic audit trails
21 CFR Part 11 & EU Annex 11
Uncountable PLM surfacing patterns across thousands of experiments and production runs
Powered by Bodie
Notebook drafting with Gen AI: written from your own records

What our customers say

Clariant
1,000+ users across 35+ facilities
Replaced a legacy ELN with one structured scientific backbone connecting synthesis and application teams across the organization.
Clariant
Black background with the word CARBON in bold uppercase white letters.
“Analysis projects that were taking us hours per day can now be done in just a few minutes,” says Marie Herring, Senior Research Scientist.
Marie Herring
Senior Research Scientist, Carbon

When an ELN is not enough

A traditional ELN can preserve the narrative of an experiment. But product-development teams also need to understand how that experiment relates to the formulation, material, sample, test method, specification, quality record, project, and product change that follow.

Uncountable connects the lab notebook to the wider R&D data model. Scientists can retain the reasoning and observations behind an experiment while making the underlying data structured, searchable, and available to the teams responsible for formulation, quality, scale-up, and manufacturing.

Diagram showing a laboratory experiment entry titled 'Blend 114' with tags, links, files, and a note, carrying its metadata to a Q3 Surfactant Screening Report chart where Blend 114 is highlighted with a value of 88, illustrating automatic transfer of tagged experiment data to the report.

The notebook that is also a database.

Keep the readable story of every experiment, and make it structured, so a year of research is searchable by what is in it and nothing is lost when someone leaves.

FAQs

What is Uncountable's ELN?

It is the electronic lab notebook capability of the Uncountable platform, part of the Research & Development suite. It keeps the readable narrative of an experiment and makes each entry structured, so the notebook is searchable by ingredient, process, or result, with formulations, instrument data, and plots embedded in the record and linked to LIMS, QC, PLM and Project Management.

How is it different from a traditional ELN?

A traditional ELN is a scientific word processor: readable, but the results live in free text that can only be searched by title, author, and date. Uncountable's ELN keeps the narrative and adds structure, so entries are queryable by content, the data is embedded rather than pasted as a screenshot, and every entry connects to the rest of the platform.

Can I search past notebook entries by content?

Yes. Search across every entry by ingredient, process condition, measured property, or chemical structure, spanning projects and years, including archived and failed experiments. Past work is found by what is in it, not just by who wrote it or when.

Does the ELN support E-signatures and audit trails?

Yes. Review workflows, electronic signatures, and automatic audit trails are built in and meet FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11, so a governed, review-ready notebook is a byproduct of the work rather than a separate chore.

Can we migrate our existing notebooks?

Yes. Existing notebooks and records are migrated during implementation, so historical experiments become searchable in the same structured system as new work, and teams can run in parallel through cutover so nothing is lost.

What is the difference between an ELN and a LIMS?

An ELN captures the scientific narrative of an experiment, including procedures, observations, calculations, and conclusions. A LIMS manages laboratory operations such as samples, materials, methods, tests, instruments, and results. Uncountable connects ELN and LIMS data so the experimental record and operational laboratory record remain part of the same R&D context.

What is the difference between an ELN, LIMS, R&D data platform, and PLM?

An ELN captures experimental knowledge. A LIMS manages samples and laboratory workflows. An R&D data platform connects experimental, formulation, sample, test, and result data across teams and sites. PLM manages the controlled product record through scale-up, specifications, change, and commercialization. Uncountable connects these capabilities through one shared data foundation.

Why do formulation teams need an ELN?

Formulation teams need an ELN to document experimental reasoning, processing conditions, observations, and conclusions. They also need connected formulation, material, and test-result data to compare trials, identify patterns, reuse knowledge, and make confident product-development decisions.

Stop watching demos. Start running yours.

No slideware, just your workflow, live.