ISO/TC 176/SC 2 has scheduled the sixth edition of ISO 9001 for publication on September 16, 2026. For quality leaders, that date is a useful reason to start planning, but the transition should not begin and end with a clause-by-clause document review. The more important question is whether the organization can retrieve and explain the evidence behind its quality system.
A quality management system is demonstrated less by its procedures than by how people actually use them: managing changes, investigating nonconformities, addressing corrective actions, evaluating suppliers, conducting audits, and reviewing performance. That evidence is often scattered. A procedure may be current in a document-management system, training records may sit elsewhere, CAPAs may be held in a QMS, supplier approvals may be stored in an ERP, audit findings may live in spreadsheets, and management-review inputs may be assembled manually every quarter. Each record may be valid on its own; the weakness shows up when someone needs to understand how they connect.
.png)
What to Do Before the Final Standard Is Published
The final ISO 9001:2026 text and formal transition arrangements should be reviewed once published, and certification bodies and accreditation infrastructure will provide the guidance relevant to certified organizations. In the meantime, you don't need to wait to improve the evidence model behind your current quality system.
Start with five questions:
1. Can we identify the current approved process? For every critical quality process, users should be able to locate the current approved procedure, know who owns it and understand what it applies to.
2. Can we show who is competent to perform it? A training record is more useful when it is connected to the relevant procedure, role and effective date. If a procedure changes, can the organization identify who needs training or reauthorization?
3. Can we trace an issue through to effective action? Select a recent nonconformance. Can you retrieve the event, investigation, root cause, CAPA, action completion, effectiveness review and any related change?
4. Can we explain what changed and why? A controlled change should show scope, impact assessment, approvals, implementation, training and post-implementation review where appropriate. The organization should be able to explain how a current specification, procedure or process became the current state.
5. Can we retrieve evidence without relying on individual memory? If the only way to answer an audit question is to ask the person who has worked there the longest, the quality system has an evidence-retrieval risk.
The Climate-Action Context Remains Relevant
ISO 9001:2015/Amd 1:2024 requires organizations to determine whether climate change is a relevant issue and adds a note that relevant interested parties can have requirements related to climate change. In practice, this means considering climate change within the organization's existing assessment of context and interested-party requirements, documenting the conclusion, and acting on it where relevant, not necessarily standing up a new climate program.
A practical evidence path might connect:
- Organizational context.
- Interested-party requirements.
- Risk and opportunity assessment.
- Quality objectives and planning.
- Management-review discussion.
- Actions and follow-up.
The key is to avoid treating climate context as a disconnected checkbox. If it is relevant, it should be considered within the processes the organization already uses to manage quality-system context and planning.
Run a Mock Audit Before the Transition Program Grows
A simple retrieval exercise can reveal more than a large document inventory: ask a cross-functional team to answer one realistic question, such as, "Show the current supplier-approval procedure, the evidence used to approve a key supplier, any quality event related to that supplier, the corrective action taken, and the management-review evidence showing whether the issue was resolved."
Track:
- Time needed to answer.
- Systems and folders used.
- Manual spreadsheets or email searches required.
- Missing links.
- Reliance on individual knowledge.
The results will identify which processes need attention first.
Do Not Turn the Transition Into a Document-Control Project
A revised standard can create pressure to update every procedure quickly, producing a large amount of administrative work without making the quality system any easier to operate or audit. The better approach is to focus on evidence quality:
- Current controlled information.
- Clear ownership.
- Connected training and competency evidence.
- Traceable nonconformance, CAPA and change workflows.
- Audit and management-review actions that lead to visible improvement.
- Reliable access to historical records.
The Transition Opportunity
ISO 9001:2026 is an opportunity to reduce the reconstruction work that accumulates in mature quality systems. When records, people, processes, and decisions are connected, audits become easier to prepare for, and more importantly, quality teams can spend less time collecting evidence and more time improving the processes that evidence describes.
References
ISO/TC 176/SC 2. ISO 9001 revision update. The sixth edition of ISO 9001 is scheduled for publication on 16 September 2026. https://committee.iso.org/sites/tc176sc2/home/news/content-left-area/news-and-updates/news-1.html
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9001:2015/Amd 1:2024, Quality management systems — Requirements — Amendment 1: Climate action changes. https://www.iso.org/standard/88431.html
.png)
.png)
.png)
