The problem: approvals with no audit trail
Engineering changes need the right approvals at the right phase. When approvals happen by email, there's no reliable record of who signed off.
An email thread can show that someone replied "approved", but not whether they were the right approver for that phase, what version they saw or why a change was rejected. Reconstructing that later, for an audit or an investigation, is slow and often incomplete.
What this demo shows
- Follow a change request through a configured approval workflow.
- See phase-specific approval requirements and mandatory comments for rejections.
- Sign with a PIN.
- See how advancing a change can lock the record, and how phase history captures who moved it and when.
Why it matters
Approval workflows that match your process make sure each change gets the right sign-off at the right point. Mandatory rejection comments capture the reasoning that would otherwise be lost.
PIN signatures and phase history give a record that stands up to review, and locking the record once a change advances stops edits after approval.
See it with your own data
This video is part of Product Lifecycle Management. To see how it would work with your own formulations and records, request a demo. Our team replies within 30 minutes during business hours.
Read the transcript
In the Uncountable PLM suite, every change request moves through phases you define. The phase bar shows where each change stands. Each phase can require a set number of approvals. A rejection needs a comment. Approvers sign with their PIN. Advance the change and the record locks. Phase history shows who moved it and when.
Every change, every signature, one PLM suite.
