The problem: method changes with no clear history
When several people edit a method, it's hard to show who changed what, and when, without a built-in audit trail.
A cure temperature changes from 140 °C to 180 °C during review. If the method lives in a document or spreadsheet, the only evidence of the change is the new number, with no record of who made it or what it replaced.
What this demo shows
- A scientist drafts the method change.
- A second user edits the same record, changing the cure temperature.
- The change moves from Draft to Approved.
- The event log keeps each change.
Why it matters
Method changes affect every result produced with the method. An audit trail that keeps each edit, with the user, time and previous value, makes the history of a method clear.
Moving the change through Draft, QA review and Approved, with every step logged, gives reviewers and auditors the record they expect.
See it with your own data
This video is part of LIMS for R&D. To see how it would work with your own formulations and records, request a demo. Our team replies within 30 minutes during business hours.
Read the transcript
Traceability is easy to claim. Here is what it looks like in Uncountable, where lab data is structured. A scientist drafts a method change and sets the cure temperature to 140°. In QA review, a second user changes it to 180° and sets the effective date. Then, the record moves to approved. The event log shows every change, who made it, when, the previous value, and the new value.
Ask every vendor to show this on a live record.
