The problem: release checks done after the fact
When results are checked against spec only at the end, failures surface late and release slows down.
An analyst enters a full set of results, then someone compares them with the spec in a separate step. A failure found at that point means rework, and release waits on whoever does the comparison.
What this demo shows
- Specs, test results and quality records sit together in one system.
- Each QC result is checked against the release spec as it's entered.
- Lock the batch with a PIN-based electronic signature.
Why it matters
Checking each result against the release spec as it's entered surfaces a failure while the sample is still on the bench. Passing batches move to release without a separate review step.
A PIN-based electronic signature locks the record once it's approved, so the released results can't change and the record is ready for audit.
See it with your own data
This video is part of QC LIMS. To see how it would work with your own formulations and records, request a demo. Our team replies within 30 minutes during business hours.
Read the transcript
Uncountable keeps specs, test results, and quality records in one system. Each result is checked against the release spec as it goes in. When every result passes, the analyst signs. A pin and an electronic signature lock the record against edits. A signed, locked record for each release.
