The problem: plant data that doesn't know which batch it belongs to
Historians record every tag, but not which batch was in the vessel or which step it had reached. When a batch fails QC, someone exports a time window and lines it up with the batch record by hand.
Process data and batch records live in separate systems. Lining up a temperature trace with the batch and step it belongs to takes exports, timestamps and patience.
What this demo shows
- Scan plant tags and flag a temperature and pressure spike on reactor R-101.
- Find the batch bound to that window, B-2410-20, and open its record.
- Read the trace to see which step the spike hit.
- Fix a late step time so the record matches what happened.
Why it matters
When QC fails, the first question is what happened in the vessel. Binding plant tags to batches and steps answers it directly.
Seeing the excursion inside its step, next to the formulation and QC results, gets the team from failure to cause faster.
See it with your own data
This video is part of Data Historian. To see how it would work with your own formulations and records, request a demo. Our team replies within 30 minutes during business hours.
Read the transcript
Uncountable keeps R&D and QC data in one place. Now, your process data lives there, too. Every plant tag at a glance. On reactor R101, run rules flag a temperature and pressure spike, then QC fails. Every historian shows that. Which batch did it hit? Bindings answer it. The reactor's tags are bound to that batch for its run.
Open the batch. Its formulation and its failed QC results sit on one record. Batch execution stamps each step, so the trace shows the excursion inside reaction hold. Step logged late? Fix the times right on the trace, so every step window stays accurate. Now, QC and R&D see the process behind every result.
